Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 1 Dec 2001 09:42:14 -0700 (MST)
From:      Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
To:        phk@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: philosophical question...
Message-ID:  <200112011642.JAA09819@lariat.org>
In-Reply-To: <36180.1007217784@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Would it inconvenience debugging that malloc(3) becomes non
> deterministic in its layout ?

> Would the increased uncertainty on program run-time be 
> good or bad ?

It could make reproduction of problems more difficult. So, if
it goes in, I'd like a switch to turn it off.... Maybe a
sysctl.

But there's a more serious philosophical issue here. Isn't
shuffling the heap to avoid attacks really a form of
"security via obscurity?"

--Brett Glass

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112011642.JAA09819>