Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 2 Jul 2026 22:05:07 -0700
From:      Yuri Victorovich <yuri@FreeBSD.org>
To:        =?UTF-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_git=3A_a816f578c1dc_-_main_-_science/py-tweedledum?= =?UTF-8?B?OiB1cGRhdGUgMS4xLjEtMjAyMjExMjMg4oaSIDEuMi4w?=
Message-ID:  <fbe71b44-0fce-4aa3-8771-bd82408eee5d@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <86zf096tnc.fsf@ltc.des.dev>
References:  <6a46a5b1.2276e.226b6bfe@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <86zf096tnc.fsf@ltc.des.dev>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

Hi,


On 7/2/26 13:09, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Why did you commit an old and incorrect version of this patch instead of
> just approving the review, or committing the patch from the review?


The Bugzilla issue is not linked to the review so I didn't notice it.


However, the two patches are almost identical.

The review has DISTVERSIONSUFFIX=-20260518 which is a minor thing and I 
don't think it should be in the port.

The correct action item is to ask the upstream to make a release which I 
did.


The port is fine as it is now.



Regards,

Yuri




home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fbe71b44-0fce-4aa3-8771-bd82408eee5d>