Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:11:00 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Garance A Drosehn <gad@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/pkill pkill.1 pkill.c Message-ID: <200508251011.02844.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <p0623090bbf32a4228fe7@[128.113.24.47]> References: <200508241938.j7OJcSNW066686@repoman.freebsd.org> <p06230909bf329ce9de72@[128.113.24.47]> <p0623090bbf32a4228fe7@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 06:26 pm, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > At 6:14 PM -0400 8/24/05, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > >I'd slightly prefer something other than adding another option, > >but I can't think of anything which is particularly better. The > >only other suggestion might be to have "daemon.lpid" filenames > >instead of "daemon.pid", but that also seems icky to me. > > To extend that a bit: it might be nice if daemons which used > the new library would create "daemon.lpid" files, just so it > is easy to tell which pid-files are using the new code. But I > think it would be ugly for `pkill' to alter its behavior based > on the filename given... Yeah, I think that's uglier than a new option personally. :) I'm ok with the -L approach. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200508251011.02844.jhb>