Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 8 May 2006 14:20:24 GMT
From:      Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: docs/96639: [patch] suggestion to committer's guide that should have a description about remove ports
Message-ID:  <200605081420.k48EKOqd062860@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/96639; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org>
To: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/96639: [patch] suggestion to committer's guide that should have a description about remove ports
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:12:29 +0300

 On 2006-05-08 16:57, Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
 >On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 04:51:41PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
 >> On 2006-05-04 08:10, Vasil Dimov <vd@freebsd.org> wrote:
 >> >  Looks fine, here is a slightly modified version:
 >> >
 >> >  +	<title>Removing an Existing Port</title>
 >> >  +
 >> >  +	<qandaentry>
 >> [...]
 >> >  +	    <para>However, there is a
 >> >  +	      <command>ports/Tools/scripts/rmport</command> script
 >> >  +	      that automates all the necessary steps for removing a port.
 >> >  +	      It was written by &a.vd;, who is also the current maintainer
 >> >  +	      so please send questions/patches about
 >> >  +	      <command>rmport</command> to him.</para>
 >> >  +	  </answer>
 >> 
 >> Since `rmport' is an alternative way of removing a port, how about the
 >> following minor rewording of the above paragraph?
 >> 
 >>     <para>Alternatively, you can use the <command>rmport</command> script,
 >>       from <filename role="directory">ports/Tools/scripts</filename>.
 >>       This script has been written by &a.vd;, who is also its current
 >>       maintainer, so please send questions, patches or suggestions about
 >>       <command>rmport</command> to him.</para>
 > Sounds good.
 > 
 >> 
 >> Also, is anyone going to commit the changes of this PR?  They look like
 >> a useful addition to the docs.  Let's not leave them to rot in Gnats for
 >> too long :-)
 >
 > Well, I guess one needs a doc commit bit to do so?
 
 Or a review from a doc-committer.  You have mine already.  Or, I can
 do the doc-build test & commit work, if you are satisfied with the
 current version of the patch :)
 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605081420.k48EKOqd062860>