Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:56:19 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD virtualization mailing list <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: if_bridge VIMAGE patch Message-ID: <20110113155141.I14966@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <4D2F1B52.1010802@freebsd.org> References: <4D2EF336.5010905@gmx.com> <4D2F1B52.1010802@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 1/13/11 4:42 AM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please, review the attached patch. It is against yesterday's HEAD
>> and it virtualizes if_bridge.
>
> without examining every character, it looks ok.
> The script should go in /usr/share/examples/netgraph
>
> Bjoern/Marko, see any problems?
Despite the fact that the script does not use netgraph?
I like the virtualization and I have carp done.
It's just that if_cloners shouldn't all be done on their own. I
haven't looked at the fact whether this allows bridges per-vnet or
just does vmove magic.
I would really appreciate if someone would support the move of the general
infrastructure from perforce to HEAD (and help so we can get an exp run
for the ports which break similarly).
That would help interface and other subsystems (people are doing)
immendiately.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
<ks> Going to jail sucks -- <bz> All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110113155141.I14966>