Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:17:40 -0500
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Deadlock with option FULL_PREEMPTION
Message-ID:  <200502081317.40267.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050206134113.GA77071@peter.osted.lan>
References:  <20050206134113.GA77071@peter.osted.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 06 February 2005 08:41 am, Peter Holm wrote:
> With GENERIC HEAD from Feb 5 09:19 UTC + FULL_PREEMPTION +
> mpsafe_vfs = 1 I ran into what appears to be the same deadlock
> twice. This is the first one:
> http://www.holm.cc/stress/log/cons114.html

What is the deadlock exactly?  It looks like lots of threads banging on fork() 
and that they are all waiting on an exclusive lock of allproc_lock while 
holding a shared lock of proctree_lock (except for the 1 thread currently 
doing a fork that is on a run queue because it was preempted by IRQ 0 which 
kicked off softclock).  Can you get 'ps' output?

-- 
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve"  =  http://www.FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502081317.40267.jhb>