Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:16:56 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> To: mike@FreeBSD.org Cc: nectar@FreeBSD.org, phk@critter.freebsd.dk, wollman@lcs.mit.edu, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_descrip.c kern_exec.c src/sys/sys filedesc.h Message-ID: <20020423.101656.38781717.imp@village.org> In-Reply-To: <20020423120949.G72727@espresso.q9media.com> References: <20020423114052.F72727@espresso.q9media.com> <20020423.095226.96600629.imp@village.org> <20020423120949.G72727@espresso.q9media.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20020423120949.G72727@espresso.q9media.com>
Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: A user should be able to choose the security policy of his/her system.
: If that means one has to add `option POSIX_SETUGID_HANDLING', that's
: fine, but to force a security policy down a user's throat, I think, is
: wrong. This applies to Robert's comments as well.
How is that different than access controls or memory protection
between processes?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020423.101656.38781717.imp>