Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 28 Nov 2020 05:46:15 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 251363] use unionfs as a disk-cache for NFS [feature]
Message-ID:  <bug-251363-227-xqY8umM5UZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-251363-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-251363-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251363

Gunther Schadow <raj@gusw.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu
                   |                            |gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2=
514
                   |                            |33

--- Comment #14 from Gunther Schadow <raj@gusw.net> ---
Cross referencing the bug 251433 I just filed, since that is in fact a real
bug.

The question is does it really matter to me? What is my workaround?

Clearly I need to be able to make the copy on the upper layer. And it is ro=
ot
that must make that copy. The effective user id to decide if the VOP_CREATE=
 is
allowed must be root, or whatever user did the mount_unionfs. Not the user
accessing the file right now.

The owner uid and gid should be exactly that from the lower layer. Not the =
euid
of the user accessing the file.

I need to understand how this VOP_CREATE ultimately works.=20

Note that it seems to work right with the shadow directories. So that might=
 be
a clue.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251363-227-xqY8umM5UZ>