Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 19:10:00 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 291200] ports-mgmt/pkg periodic script weekly/400.status-pkg uses a wrong pkg -R option Message-ID: <bug-291200-32340-rIRosp8UPE@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-291200-32340@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=291200 --- Comment #6 from gebhart@secnetix.de --- Sounds like a good idea to handle ports seperately, because with every new version of pkg more bugs are introduced. With 2.6.x I have to run pkg -N as root now though the database is readable for everyone. Otherwise it reports, pkg: package database non-existent. Maybe just a stupid idea, but how about simply use an older version of pkg to fix that? I have not updated pkg on many machines since 2.4.x was released and on all of those I still get usable output. Or add -ports option or something like that, that behaves correctly for ports. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-291200-32340-rIRosp8UPE>