Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 19:22:01 GMT From: jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly) To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More breakage in -current as a result of header frobbing. Message-ID: <34f0277d.678104@mail.cetlink.net> In-Reply-To: <19980221143803.31160@freebie.lemis.com> References: <199802210245.NAA06439@cimlogic.com.au> <23061.888029515@time.cdrom.com> <19980221143803.31160@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 21 Feb 1998 14:38:03 +1030, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> wrote: >Maybe now's an appropriate time to come out with a thing that I've >been meaning to propose for some time: > >Sure, living with -CURRENT means never knowing where your next install >comes from I propose that after 2.2.6 or 2.2.7, whichever comes last, that you just do away with -stable altogether and start making three or four CD SNAPs of -current per year and call it "semi-stable." Just catch the -current tree at a really good time when making those CDs. >From my point of view, the gap between -stable and -current has grown too wide to keep much interest in -stable. PPPD is a good example. The version in -stable is more than two years old. -- The day of the proprietary OS is over. Long live free software. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34f0277d.678104>