Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:41:17 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org> To: t_ziel <t_ziel@wp.pl> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is somebody working on these ports? (libquantum, spark, eiffel) Message-ID: <20090806114117.01e3bc4d@baby-jane.lamaiziere.net> In-Reply-To: <4a79b851c35591.53590172@wp.pl> References: <4a79900244e836.09814382@wp.pl> <20090805172512.0917a158@baby-jane.lamaiziere.net> <4a79b851c35591.53590172@wp.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:50:25 +0200, t_ziel <t_ziel@wp.pl> a =E9crit : > The latest development snapshot is dated: 2009-01-13 so it's not too=20 > old, nor dead. > http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/?group_id=3D184 Se 2 is mostly dead: http://n2.nabble.com/Status-of-SmartEiffel-(alive-or-dead)-td3085602.html > If SmartEiffel 2 is not compatible wit SmartEiffel 1, it's better to=20 > include all versions to let users decide what the want to install. Yes, but how many people use SmartEiffel? SE 1 is broken for a while on amd64 with gcc4, that's a known problem. In fact, each time I tried to use this port, it appeared to be broken in a way (does not fetch, does not build). If there are only two or three users we should remove it from the ports tree, I think.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090806114117.01e3bc4d>