Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 10:50:26 -0500 From: Jan Knepper <jan@digitaldaemon.com> To: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: binding by different process on the same port Message-ID: <4CD224CB-1114-4361-B46D-5A3E7455DA0B@digitaldaemon.com> In-Reply-To: <896832c9-7d63-cd9a-b0e9-7ad32e90568a@digiware.nl> References: <896832c9-7d63-cd9a-b0e9-7ad32e90568a@digiware.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I would guess > wjw ceph-osd-0 93336 43 tcp4 127.0.0.1:6804 *:* was started first. Claiming a specific port on a specific IP address... Jan ManiaC++ Jan Knepper > On Dec 17, 2016, at 21:20, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> wrote: > > Hi, > > I thought that the following was not (easily) possible? > wjw ceph-osd-1 93349 14 tcp4 *:6804 *:* > wjw ceph-osd-0 93336 43 tcp4 127.0.0.1:6804 *:* > > Or is it due to: > - using SO_REUSEADDR > - the fact that one address is more specific than the other and as > such they are considered different? > > --WjW > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CD224CB-1114-4361-B46D-5A3E7455DA0B>