Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:59:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: kpneal@pobox.com Cc: Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is there a way to run FreeBSD ports through port 80? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207122157140.3570@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20120712191306.GA24943@neutralgood.org> References: <CAPj0R5KJ=0yFcQG5azYfCS73oWLAfJhf4NpAz5Oozo4N-vYQyg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207121940400.2744@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CAPj0R5KsUdM6LsrtvDzSVBScO9k-TFoa=D6O6ghsch0Y-iNx%2BQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120712191306.GA24943@neutralgood.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Does your IT director understand the active/passive distinction? If not >From what he described his director is plain moron. He required him to block things that HE needs to work, leaving port 80 open so things that are best in distracting from work (youtube, facebook...) works, as well as major virus source. In places i work i was requested to a) block some websites (facebook always first on list - very good). b) block most things EXCEPT the ones needed for work, full access only for some people. So some ports and some targets do work, rest does not. This is normal IMHO.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1207122157140.3570>