Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 01:24:54 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Hartmann, O." <ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de> Cc: Antony T Curtis <antony@abacus.co.uk>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ARCH flag in new make.conf Message-ID: <20010307012454.A14664@mollari.cthul.hu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0103071022560.17134-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de>; from ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de on Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 10:23:06AM %2B0100 References: <20010307011446.A8574@mollari.cthul.hu> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0103071022560.17134-100000@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 10:23:06AM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote: > On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > Is this also true for SMP systems? SMP systems use C code like non-SMP systems; I wouldn't expect -march to generically make a difference there (i.e. it should be no different than non-SMP systems, modulo a specific gcc bug triggered by the SMP code). However, I'm certain that lots of people use -march on SMP systems with no ill effects, too. Kris --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6pf5mWry0BWjoQKURApi2AJ42GCaqUyGZ2HeRfBevU51/2klYAQCgw0H1 luk6oKVwS93oswAFXdztnRU= =PVp3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010307012454.A14664>