Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:13:09 +0400 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC, RFT] LDM support (aka Windows Dynamic Volumes) Message-ID: <4F5DB015.1030701@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmomafz-JR-WjGkes7z3A0fcGJiLpO9g8M3yvrBx7P8_RpQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <4F5C71DC.3010203@yandex.ru> <CAJ-VmomRRdbsymYZrJQrH67AwPtn6sKEGyeMKSeB3fDQYWDahA@mail.gmail.com> <4F5D78D7.5030003@yandex.ru> <CAJ-Vmomafz-JR-WjGkes7z3A0fcGJiLpO9g8M3yvrBx7P8_RpQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12.03.2012 11:49, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> partitions. Actually, it is possible make better LDM support in conjunction >> with GEOM_RAID, but i think we don't need it :) > > Hah, I wouldn't say no to being able to modify (correctly) LDM metadat.a > > i'd also love to see say, read/write Linux LVM support, but that's just me. We have geom_linux_lvm, doesn't it work for you? -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F5DB015.1030701>