Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Sep 2002 21:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Gregory Bond <gnb@itga.com.au>
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: misc/42943: fd 0,1,2 should not be set to nonblock in _thread_fd_table_init() 
Message-ID:  <200209190450.g8J4o3Io001467@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR misc/42943; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gregory Bond <gnb@itga.com.au>
To: pqf <pqf@163.net>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: misc/42943: fd 0,1,2 should not be set to nonblock in _thread_fd_table_init() 
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:40:34 +1000

 > parend process call dup2() to make fd 0 be a unix domain socket
 > parent process fork() muti-thread(pthread) child process
 > child process set fd 0 to nonblock in _thread_fd_table_init()
 > fd 0 is shared between parent process and child process, so the parent proces
 > s's fd 0 is now nonblock, but the parent process DO NOT know what happen beca
 > use it DID NOT do anything to fd 0...
 
 I would argue this is a bug in the (parent) program - if you are going to 
 share file descriptors, you'd better make sure you understand what the other 
 program is going to do to them!
 
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200209190450.g8J4o3Io001467>