Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 2 May 2002 19:58:04 +0700
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@regency.nsu.ru>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
Cc:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Jeff Roberson <jeff@freebsd.org>, arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Removal of register && K&R function decl.
Message-ID:  <20020502195804.A30954@regency.nsu.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20020502004526.GM98487@elvis.mu.org>; from bright@mu.org on Wed, May 01, 2002 at 05:45:26PM -0700
References:  <20020501193212.C9763-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> <20020502001646.GL98487@elvis.mu.org> <xzpk7qno08f.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020502004526.GM98487@elvis.mu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 05:45:26PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> [020501 17:35] wrote:
> > Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> writes:
> > > Please don't ansify functions, some people prefer the old style.
> > 
> > Last time this came up, the consensus was that ANSIfication was
> > permitted.
> 
> We also have KSE and SMPng work to do.  Also ANSIfication makes the
> code look terrible when there's more than 3 arguments.

Not to mention, this "old style" (K&R) gives code that special *BSD look
we all love ;-)

./danfe


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020502195804.A30954>