Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:09:09 +0200 From: Pierre Guinoiseau <geekounet@poildetroll.net> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vimage vs. jails Message-ID: <4A8B3495.7010304@poildetroll.net> In-Reply-To: <4A8B30D5.9000400@elischer.org> References: <20090818215721.23230@gmx.net> <4A8B30D5.9000400@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hi, Julian Elischer wrote: > it's not Vimage vs Jails > but > Vimage as part of Jails. > > > Peter Cornelius wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I just see the vimage changes going into RELENG_8 and I now am >> getting my hands dirty, finally. So thanks to all involved. >> >> Just to get my head around this the right way, I understand that >> there is no plan to merge vimage and jail into a single jail >> utility, right? > > Actually it IS now all one utility... > Add the 'vnet' option to jail to get it to create a new vnet withthe > jail, otherwise it acts as before. > >> >> I may want a large number of vimages "w/o" jails, or at least a >> number of jails "inside" a couple of vimages (reason being the >> default route issue raised a while ago). > > can you expand on that? > > example comand lines include: > jail -c host.hostname=test path=/ vnet command=/bin/tcsh > ( make a jail with the same root as normal but with a separate > network stack.) > > > jail -c host.hostname=test path=/ vnet children.max=4 \ > command=/bin/tcsh > (same as above, excep the jail made is in turn able to make > up to 4 child jails > BTW, when will we be able to set those new parameters in rc.conf? The current jails rc script still uses the old way for setting up (or maybe did I missed something?), so it doesn't allow to add those new parameters. :( It may be a desirable feature for 8.0-RELEASE I think. > >> >> Thanks again, and >> >> All the best, >> >> Peter. >> >> --- >> >> PS. I see a couple of lock order reversals on RELENG_8 which I >> would like to report if the build currently running did not address >> them -- do we prefer them to a mailing list or to gnats? > [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqLNJUACgkQJikNJSAyef+y7gCg0FhigABWk9l95l3JXLdk/dpg L/0An0S9zWVdpidmRIUboAzUC+edeMSM =SIPB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A8B3495.7010304>