Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:54:31 +0100 From: Eduardo Morras <emorras@xroff.net> To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd vs gpl Message-ID: <20090311155436.47BF94FC80A@xroff.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903111609040.19024@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.p l> References: <20090311012018.2075c3d9@gom.home> <20090311140247.GE86605@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <20090311154613.0a90e64b.freebsd@edvax.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903111609040.19024@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 16:09 11/03/2009, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>That's why the GPL is often called a "viral license". As > >GPL is a communist licence. No, even communist are more generous ... ----------------------------------------------- Useful Acronyms: GPL =3D Greedy Peng=FCin Licence=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090311155436.47BF94FC80A>