Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:28:12 -0400 From: livefreebsd@mac.com To: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cPCI Hotplug support Message-ID: <13363705.1150896492191.JavaMail.livefreebsd@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20060614073641.GA21285@uk.tiscali.com> References: <F8B081A0-0288-4203-ADCD-DD304561FFB6@mac.com> <4621CB9B-0ECC-48D2-93ED-E7480255C20C@siliconlandmark.com> <E3F46CAC-F86F-4B25-A790-931EB114BA56@mac.com> <200606130953.09621.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060614073641.GA21285@uk.tiscali.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I changed this to be 192.168.2.1 and 172.21.2.1 respectively. Still not working. There is no link light or indication of power to the interfaces. I can plug the cables into another interface of a server and they work fine. So the switches, cables and IP addresses are fine. Card just won't power up. Park On Wednesday, June 14, 2006, at 03:36AM, Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> wrote: >On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 09:53:09AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >> On Wednesday 19 April 2006 18:14, Park Foreman wrote: >> > System: Nokia IP330 using AMD K6 processor >> > Card: Zynx ZX412 dual 10/100 card and DEC/Intel 21143 chipset >> > >> > ifconfig: >> > dc0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 >> > options=8<VLAN_MTU> >> > inet 172.21.1.1 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 172.21.255.255 >> > inet6 fe80::2c0:95ff:fee5:7d8c%dc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 >> > ether 00:c0:95:e5:12:ab >> > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) >> > status: no carrier >> > dc1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 >> > options=8<VLAN_MTU> >> > inet 172.21.2.1 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 172.21.255.255 >> > inet6 fe80::2c0:95ff:fee5:7d8d%dc1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 >> > ether 00:c0:95:e5:23:cd >> > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) >> > status: no carrier > >Aside: those two IP addresses are on the same IP subnet, 172.21.0.0/16. Does >that now work? It didn't used to, but I once saw a project on the wishlist >to separate out the ARP table from the forwarding table so that this could >work. Did that happen? > >With the above configuration, both NICs would have to be plugged into the >same LAN, of course. > >Or maybe the OP meant to set /24 netmasks, but didn't. > >Regards, > >Brian. > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13363705.1150896492191.JavaMail.livefreebsd>