Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 19:38:16 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> Cc: Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org>, Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmom0jv6851wQkjyMB2pVrpQGNabHMVYXk4iHNZFs0dmptQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BE7E2041-5B33-44DD-B917-3BFB6347FB07@gmail.com> References: <50CCAB99.4040308@FreeBSD.org> <50CE5B54.3050905@FreeBSD.org> <CAJ-VmonUqe1BGrCGpwyantyr=iXPS30HrPCRj9dhfGi2Q49pvg@mail.gmail.com> <BE7E2041-5B33-44DD-B917-3BFB6347FB07@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16 December 2012 18:31, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote: >> Would you mind approaching some of the cluster peeps and seeing if >> they'll run this up on the ref10* boxes and VMs, just to get some >> further exposure? > > And maybe tinderbox..? Tinderbox is a great idea. Maybe hit up the altq/pf using crowd and see if they'll test this stuff out too? What else gets heavily callout /timer driven? Try some computational workloads that stress the fairness of ULE/4BSD, maybe? Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmom0jv6851wQkjyMB2pVrpQGNabHMVYXk4iHNZFs0dmptQ>