Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:19:17 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Erwin Lansing <erwin@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-7@freebsd.org, "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r217562 - in stable/7/secure/lib: libcrypto libssl Message-ID: <201101191019.17335.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20110119133016.GP67325@droso.net> References: <201101182219.p0IMJt9D053996@svn.freebsd.org> <201101190807.46537.jhb@freebsd.org> <20110119133016.GP67325@droso.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 8:30:16 am Erwin Lansing wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:07:46AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 5:19:55 pm Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > > > Author: simon > > > Date: Tue Jan 18 22:19:55 2011 > > > New Revision: 217562 > > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/217562 > > > > > > Log: > > > Decrease the libcrypto and libssl shared object version numbers from 6 > > > to 5. They were accidentally bumped in r215997 (on 2010-11-28) with the > > > merge of OpenSSL 0.9.8p, but unfortunately this was not caught until > > > now. > > > > > > Also add compat links for libcrypto.so.6 / libssl.so.6 (pointing to > > > their .5 counterparts) in case any users have compiled any third party > > > during the time stable/7 (and releng/7.4) were broken. > > > > > > This is deemed the last poor of bad options. Had the number bump not > > > been reverted binary packages for stable/7 would not have worked on the > > > still supported 7.3 and 7.1 releases. > > > > Erm, shouldn't the packages for 7-stable be built against the 7.0 ABI instead > > (and I thought this change was already made)? We've only supported backwards > > compat, not forwards compat. > > > Oldest supported by the security officer, currently 7.1-RELEASE-p16 to > be exact, but yes. Those are built against libcrypto.so.5, which of > course won't work on 7.4 with libcrypto.so.6, hence the above rollback > with an added symlink for those people that already built binaries > themselves against libcrypto.so.6. Ah, as there is no so.5 on a clean 7.4 system. Nevermind me then. The symlinks are certainly fine regardless, my only question was about the base the packages were being built against. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201101191019.17335.jhb>