Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:23:23 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: Eric Joyner <ricera10@gmail.com> Cc: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org>, "Pieper, Jeffrey E" <jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com>, Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CURRENT: net/igb broken Message-ID: <20150922082323.6f861448@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> In-Reply-To: <CA%2Bb0zg-EijHbX8doBecx92e7YKdGCZUv0cqMENrzGY5WYOEAJQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20150915125618.0f752596@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <55F7FCB5.5090809@selasky.org> <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D65688077F87B@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> <20150917133509.6c87f5b6@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <20150917133712.0ffd01ee@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <55FC40CB.7090504@freebsd.org> <CA%2Bb0zg_GzedJ%2BSv4p_R%2Bra6KqJauMNn1MKTuxhc6tfWHszfzvQ@mail.gmail.com> <55FDA830.7030307@freebsd.org> <20150921105848.386d6ae0@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <CA%2Bb0zg-EijHbX8doBecx92e7YKdGCZUv0cqMENrzGY5WYOEAJQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:13:18 +0000 Eric Joyner <ricera10@gmail.com> wrote: > If you do a diff between r288057 and r287761, there are no differences > between the sys/dev/e1000, sys/modules/em, and sys/modules/igb directories. > Are you sure r287761 actually works? I'm quite sure r287761 works (and r287762 doesn't), double checked this this morning again. I also checked r288093 and it is still not working. The ensure that I'm not the culprit and stupid here: I use a NanoBSD environment and the only thing that gets exchanged, is the underlying OS/OS revision. The configuration always stays the same. The base system for all of my tests is built from a clean source - (deleted obj/ dir, clean, fresh build into obj/ for every test I ran). I realised a funny thing. Playing around with enabling/disabling TSO (I have been told that could be the culprit in an earlier Email from this list) with the commend sequence: ifconfig igb1 down ifconfig igb1 -tso ifconfig igb1 up ifconfig igb1 down ifconfig igb1 tso ifconfig igb1 up . . . while a ping is pinging in the background a remote host connected to that specific interface, the ping does work for a while and dies then after a round trip of roughly 10 - 20. I can reproduce this. is that observation of any help? Regards, oh > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:58 AM O. Hartmann <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> > wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:23:44 -0700 > > Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > > > > > > > > > On 09/18/15 10:20, Eric Joyner wrote: > > > > He has an i210 -- he would want to revert e1000_i210.[ch], too. > > > > > > > > Sorry for the thrash Sean -- it sounds like it would be a good idea > > > > for you should revert this patch, and Jeff and I can go look at > > > > trying these shared code updates and igb changes internally again. > > > > We at Intel really could've done a better job of making sure these > > > > changes worked across a wider variety of devices. > > > > > > > > - Eric > > > > > > I've reverted the changes to head. I'll reopen the reviews and we can > > > proceed from there. > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:50 AM Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org > > > > <mailto:sbruno@freebsd.org>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> r287762 broke the system > > > > > > > > > > > > Before I revert this changeset *again* can you test revert r287762 > > > > from if_igb.c, e1000_82575.c and e1000_82575.h *only* > > > > > > > > That narrows down the change quite a bit. > > > > > > > > sean _______________________________________________ > > > > freebsd-current@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org> > > > > mailing list > > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To > > > > unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > > > > <mailto:freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org>" > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > Version: GnuPG v2 > > > > > > iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJV/agsXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w > > > ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCQUFENDYzMkU3MTIxREU4RDIwOTk3REQx > > > MjAxRUZDQTFFNzI3RTY0AAoJEBIB78oecn5kkkMH/icGgcIAdm3CIxtXtnhbE5E9 > > > N6RrBrgJruoRHP2geJ9UOUGp7MaFwS6AHcwCC7FvxoydzcsT+iMj3Kreu+aEkT4C > > > PZvLsqIvLeX0WVEXSC8jwBAZbrOwJ+4TcMMnW2KZMeUPUHAd8rP0+Skj9AeQ4feJ > > > OfLqv52VdxYTnx+vYbvZSaOgWp8sC+PcoJxiJua7hpmqXwISbcG9eXxQHUil0fcv > > > tqfb2dv89VN12brFuQbFtgEK2RG6gKtbj7IQkeQqzt0g5WL6UnJ5OslajcEJwIA4 > > > H6H4eke5CQUugVTUv5cbCwmQDfAF2qF8JgsxuuQDPvQRb4+XH1ks/5SEhENItv0= > > > =JTMu > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > I'm now on r288057 on that specific machine, supposedly reverted changes > > that > > seemingly has been identified as the culprit. Still NO change in behaviour! > > > > r287761 works with the same configuration on igb (i210), any further does > > not. > > Not ping/connect from the outside, no ping/connect from the inside. Tried > > different protocols (SAMBA, ssh, LDAP, DNS). Affected is/are only boxes > > with > > the igb driver and i210 chipset (we do not have other chips covered by > > igb). > > > > Regards, > > Oliver > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150922082323.6f861448>