Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:00:00 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD current mailing list <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: boot0cfg -s vs. GEOM_PART_*? Message-ID: <15566.1234900800@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:29:10 PST." <D1292F9E-BF53-443F-9E63-92D527A41A3B@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <D1292F9E-BF53-443F-9E63-92D527A41A3B@mac.com>, Marcel Moolenaar wri tes: >1. We need to expose the current bootcode through > kern.geom.confxml No. No. NO. We do not want arbitrary large binary blobs in the confxml output. Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15566.1234900800>