Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:30:00 +0000 From: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net> To: Lawrence Sica <lomion@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCO Lawsuits, round 2 Message-ID: <20031120103000.GM66785@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <388284A0-1B27-11D8-A469-000393A335A2@mac.com> References: <23740.216.195.235.103.1069277586.squirrel@webmail.gigguardian.com> <20031119224613.GI66785@submonkey.net> <20031119221537.O731@ganymede.hub.org> <388284A0-1B27-11D8-A469-000393A335A2@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--/0P/MvzTfyTu5j9Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:00:27AM -0500, Lawrence Sica wrote: > On Nov 19, 2003, at 9:16 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Ceri Davies wrote: > > > >>"I agree that the more yarn you pull out the more you see," McBride=20 > >>said > >>during a press briefing at the inaugural Enterprise IT Week at cdXpo > >>Conference here. "We have enough sorted out, but we are so focused on > >>the [IBM litigation]. With our limited energies and what our guys are > >>going through, we probably won't file any suits against BSD until > >>sometime in the first half of next year." > > > >Um ... who is BSD? *scratch head* Or do they intend to sue Berkeley > >themselves? >=20 > The various *BSDs and Apple one must assume. Apple is probably a=20 > prime target. Well Apple aren't using a BSD kernel as I understand it, so they're probably safe. Ceri --=20 --/0P/MvzTfyTu5j9Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/vJeoocfcwTS3JF8RAkdmAJ4lkJJcKO7b5Y2Yd97+hNjM5yx/RgCeLLaw TL8o5sDwahcll3Kycjurx/0= =4TqL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/0P/MvzTfyTu5j9Q--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031120103000.GM66785>