Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Jan 1999 09:58:02 -0800 (PST)
From:      David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com>
To:        current@FreeBSD.ORG, des@flood.ping.uio.no
Subject:   Re: CALL FOR FEEDBACK: inetd
Message-ID:  <199901261758.JAA05166@pau-amma.whistle.com>
In-Reply-To: <xzp7lvcfg8r.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
>Date: 28 Dec 1998 16:17:24 +0100

>I just committed a patch to inetd (rev. 1.44 of inetd.c) which I hope
>fixes the "junk pointer: too low to make sense" bug mentioned in PR
>bin/8183. I'd appreciate if those of you who have experienced problems
>with inetd would tell me as quickly as possible if the patch
>alleviates those problems.

I realize that this note may be so late that it is anticlimactic... but
the 3.0 machine here that had been exhibiting the above-referenced
problems (typically, in conjunction with amanda backups) has resolutely
failed to exhibit them since the inetd patch was installed.

We believe that the machine has been exercised enough that the symptoms
would have recurred had the problem(s) still existed.

Thanks,
david
-- 
David Wolfskill		UNIX System Administrator
dhw@whistle.com		voice: (650) 577-7158	pager: (650) 371-4621

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901261758.JAA05166>