Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 16:48:20 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fbsd11 & sshv1 Message-ID: <20170201134820.GC79121@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <1702010520560.39428@mx5.roble.com> References: <mailman.55.1485864001.36850.freebsd-security@freebsd.org> <20170131121248.GC74900@chujemuje> <1702010520560.39428@mx5.roble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:31:28AM -0800, Roger Marquis wrote: > > I believe FreeBSD should just have a slave port with OpenSSH 7.4, used only > > for SSHv1. People using such port should know the consequences of it. > > This could be a good candidate for a new ports category, > > /usr/ports/legacy > > If implemented there is a lot of code, in both ports and base, that > should be relocated. (telnet, rsh/rlogin/rcp/..., nis/yp, rpc.*, cvs, > games, ppp, sendmail, finger, ...) ...nfs, kerberos, sshv2, top, GENERIC, cp, mv, ifconfig, netstat...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170201134820.GC79121>