Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:51:41 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> To: Olivier Houchard <mlfbsd@ci0.org> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de> Subject: Re: Sleeping thread (tid 100017, pid 27) owns a non-sleepable lock Message-ID: <20060825135140.GI49178@cicely12.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20060825121341.GG49178@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <20060825093816.GD49178@cicely12.cicely.de> <20060825111209.GA59325@ci0.org> <20060825121341.GG49178@cicely12.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 02:13:41PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 01:12:10PM +0200, Olivier Houchard wrote: > > > > Here, something is deadly wrong. You get a page fault while scheduling the > > interrupt. Most likely something writes where it shouldn't and corrupts the > > ithread structures, or you're mixing INTR_FAST and non-INTR_FAST drivers, but > > reading at your dmesg it doesn't seem so. > > Can you reproduce it, or does it just happen randomly ? > > It is reproduceable. > And contrary to the original boot problem I get excactly the same panic > when turning off one SDRAM chip. > But the panic is gone if I use a kernel without my rlswitch driver. > Now ukphy gets connected to all 6 PHY mappings. > Can't imagine at which place rlswitch could have corrupted memory, but > maybe it happens because of refusing multiple attachment. If I don't refuse multiple connects everthing is fine. So there is a problem elsewhere. -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de http://www.fizon.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de support@fizon.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060825135140.GI49178>