Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:25:08 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Derrick T. Woolworth" <dwoolworth@gmail.com> Cc: performance@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x Message-ID: <20061012222508.GA63618@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <10fd06c60610121517s3e7c1266i9ccd026dc1adc974@mail.gmail.com> References: <10fd06c60610121226y1e985564sbf8f2c6f84050228@mail.gmail.com> <20061012210052.38916.qmail@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <10fd06c60610121517s3e7c1266i9ccd026dc1adc974@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 05:17:31PM -0500, Derrick T. Woolworth wrote: > Where are the numbers for this? Where is the proof? Are you using > CARP and PF in the 4.x kernel? Are you using UNIX sockets in 4.x? >=20 > The fact that your claims haven't been substantiated leads me to > believe you're not really trying to solve any problems. Just ignore this guy, he has an extremely narrow focus of what he wants to use FreeBSD for, and since FreeBSD doesn't meet his standards in this single area he claims that the entire OS is useless for any purposes. Kris --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFLsDEWry0BWjoQKURAipMAKC/xM/GHHpoEai9seVN+TxkUISTYQCdGV6M 5D/H7IqNGnv9ISOH4bQBd7s= =H/jl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061012222508.GA63618>