Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:04:12 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Eduardo Morras <emorras@xroff.net> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd vs gpl Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903111702330.19221@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20090311155436.47BF94FC80A@xroff.net> References: <20090311012018.2075c3d9@gom.home> <20090311140247.GE86605@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <20090311154613.0a90e64b.freebsd@edvax.de> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903111609040.19024@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090311155436.47BF94FC80A@xroff.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> At 16:09 11/03/2009, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> That's why the GPL is often called a "viral license". As >> >> GPL is a communist licence. > > No, even communist are more generous ... It's not funny. Communism is common today, and it's getting stronger from day they just changed to names to hide. Computers are just one thing. As usual - Richard Stallman probably wanted good, but - it turned as usual.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0903111702330.19221>