Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:29:04 -0600 From: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com> To: hiren panchasara <hiren@strugglingcoder.info> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Scott Long <scott4long@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Silly experiments with netisr Message-ID: <747BECC7-98A8-4EA4-AFE1-4B1B7039862C@netgate.com> In-Reply-To: <20150205202314.GD69733@strugglingcoder.info> References: <54D3BE67.8060502@ignoranthack.me> <752D84FB-0B65-47CF-973A-91C3697A28DC@yahoo.com> <20150205202314.GD69733@strugglingcoder.info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Feb 5, 2015, at 2:23 PM, hiren panchasara = <hiren@strugglingcoder.info> wrote: >=20 > On 02/05/15 at 12:31P, Scott Long via freebsd-net wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> Welcome to our workload. Granted, we don?t involve pf, but the = majority of our CPU processing right now is spent in TCP (with the rest = being spent in the VM, but that?s a different matter). >>=20 >> FWIW, Randall has some optimizations in this area of the stack. They = aren?t huge, IIRC they?re only a few percent, but worth looking at. > Scott, >=20 > It'd be great if you guys can share it. And yes, any small persentage = would > help :-) As long as it=E2=80=99s not at the expense of forwarding.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?747BECC7-98A8-4EA4-AFE1-4B1B7039862C>