Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 14:11:14 -0500 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: cjclark@home.com, Juergen Nickelsen <jnickelsen@acm.org>, Kris Kirby <kris@hiwaay.net>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Windows 2000 isn't that smart, but everything else is Message-ID: <20000216141114.B48524@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> In-Reply-To: <200002161843.LAA16011@usr02.primenet.com>; from tlambert@primenet.com on Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 06:43:51PM %2B0000 References: <20000215210935.C45552@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> <200002161843.LAA16011@usr02.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 06:43:51PM +0000, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > I saw this a lot from a FreeBSD box (3.4-RELEASE) that was connected > > > to the same Ethernet segment with two NICs (in different logical > > > networks). It really got on my nerves, and Windows 2000 was not > > > involved. > > > > Shouldn't put two NICs from one host on one physical LAN. Hurts > > network performance. I have yet to hear a good reason to do it. > > Because when Windows NT did it on a 4 processor box with the > interrupt processing for each NIC bound to a different processor > (e.g. non-symmetric multiprocessing), they blew the doors off > of Linux when it came to file server performance? What was the network configuation? The performance was processor-NIC limted rather than by network bandwidth? -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@home.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000216141114.B48524>