Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:06:37 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fix make release for 4-STABLE Message-ID: <20040120110636.GF56714@FreeBSD.org.ua> In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.1.20040120090951.048628e0@imap.sfu.ca> References: <20040118141444.GG51708@sirius.firepipe.net> <20040118235148M.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20040119092819.GA41159@FreeBSD.org.ua> <6.0.1.1.1.20040119094517.04743ea8@imap.sfu.ca> <20040119102834.GD41159@FreeBSD.org.ua> <6.0.1.1.1.20040120013116.0481d2c8@imap.sfu.ca> <20040120084052.GB56714@FreeBSD.org.ua> <6.0.1.1.1.20040120090951.048628e0@imap.sfu.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--SnV5plBeK2Ge1I9g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 09:11:58AM +0000, Colin Percival wrote: > At 08:40 20/01/2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:43:42AM +0000, Colin Percival wrote: > >> Isn't the port good enough? Many people seem to have an urge to > >> add stuff into base, but all that does is create more work. > > > >I somehow don't like the idea to use ports stuff to build src/ > >bits, so if we decide to switch to using it, it gets probably > >contributed to src/ anyway. >=20 > Release building has been using ports stuff for a long time, > so I'm not sure this argument makes sense. >=20 Not for the (critical) src/ part. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org --SnV5plBeK2Ge1I9g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFADQu8Ukv4P6juNwoRAronAJ449WOWrF/l8673sD8gkSeEGbo67ACeLSVZ e43H6MmoWCOAXQjYbLS2czc= =J9gw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SnV5plBeK2Ge1I9g--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040120110636.GF56714>