Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:49:19 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 and lang/gcc3x on -CURRENT Message-ID: <20040222174919.GF91129@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200402220057.36903.peter@wemm.org> References: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0402162226320.14531-100000@wn4.sci.kun.nl> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0402180933140.19109@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <200402220057.36903.peter@wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:57:36AM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > However, Intel haven't chosen either of the two names.. > They've done their own one. "IA-32e" was mentioned several times at > the IDF this week. My guess is it would wreck havoc with Intel's FUD that AMD64 isn't really 64-bits if Intel also used "64" in the platform's name. Intel has having to walk a very fine line to keep from damaging other product lines...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040222174919.GF91129>