Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 17:12:47 -0700 From: mike allison <mallison@konnections.com> To: joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, jack@diamond.xtalwind.net, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Price of FreeBSD (was On Holy Wars...) Message-ID: <335C027E.1CF2FAC7@konnections.com> References: <199704202248.SAA00418@diazepam.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yeah, I don't know enough about what NT's built on. Certainly Unix is still unix whether you're running X or not. I don't know how closely NT is built into the machine or what the underlying philosophy is. -Mike Joel Ray Holveck wrote: > > > NT needs an NTterm where you can attack the machine.... > > 95's command.com just wouldn't cut it, tho. The Unix toolbox theory > letting those of us with glasses write micro-programs on the command > line to get nontrivial tasks accomplished is decidedly a Good Thing. > > -- > http://www.wp.com/piquan --- Joel Ray Holveck --- joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu > All my opinions are my own, not the Free Software Foundation's. > > Second law of programming: > Anything that can go wrong wi > sendmail: segmentation violation -- core dumped
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?335C027E.1CF2FAC7>