Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 09:26:52 -0500 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: NanoBSD: CURRENT unable to compile 13-STABLE : error: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated ... in C Message-ID: <CAPyFy2BBcQq7GUjrVovgxf2baNk8tDST7ct_E5f%2BSZwxDQb2Xw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6321CA49-A38A-4FC6-A41E-E9964C2A94E3@FreeBSD.org> References: <20230227192011.08f7aa8e@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <E2AFBCE9-4467-4E75-B7E4-4C6E0B03C0AA@FreeBSD.org> <720721A7-B1ED-405B-98EB-04A3AFCA7FD5@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <1F3F20A1-C2BC-4A33-ABFD-D20F4ADB67E8@FreeBSD.org> <20230302064153.12940fa8@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <6321CA49-A38A-4FC6-A41E-E9964C2A94E3@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 05:14, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> wrote: > > WITHOUT_SYSTEM_COMPILER > Do not opportunistically skip building a cross-compiler during > the bootstrap phase of the build. Normally, if the currently ... > I find the double negative phrasing "do not skip" always confusing. But > the logic is normally: Yes, it's confusing -- perhaps we could rewrite it as something like "Build a cross-compiler during the build bootstrap phase, rather than opportunistically using the host's compiler."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2BBcQq7GUjrVovgxf2baNk8tDST7ct_E5f%2BSZwxDQb2Xw>