Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:35:09 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: wishmaster <artemrts@ukr.net>, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@ipfw.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Enabling VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11? Message-ID: <543B648D.6020403@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1413092963.907920156.b727jzia@frv34.fwdcdn.com> References: <CAG=rPVe_JGy%2BeUiDjHaXXi5=n2mWGOeZjHkbVeUeS_m1z1_uMg@mail.gmail.com> <BE67D12E-E8AB-401E-8B45-6BE56C1DF2FB@ipfw.ru> <1413092963.907920156.b727jzia@frv34.fwdcdn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/12/14, 1:55 PM, wishmaster wrote: > > > --- Original message --- > From: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@ipfw.ru> > Date: 11 October 2014, 23:20:39 > > > >> On 11 Oct 2014, at 21:58, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> What action items are left to enable VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11? >> Are there any tests results showing performance implications on different network-related workloads? the last time we teste things vnet made things faster. if you spread 100 sessions over N vnets and had 100 sessions on one system, then there are 1/N as many locking collisions as each vnet is its own locking domain. Julian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?543B648D.6020403>