Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 20:18:42 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-security-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [tomas@openssl.org: OpenSSL Security Advisory] Message-ID: <4434rv1j8d.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <ZhP8ahh3CGG11S0B@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> (The Doctor's message of "Mon, 8 Apr 2024 08:17:14 -0600") References: <ZhP8ahh3CGG11S0B@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> writes: > Thought they say low, I believe this is high as TLS 1.3 is becoming a default. I think the low priority comes from the fact that even though a lot of systems use TLS 1.3, only an extremely small number of them meet all of the conditions for this to be exploited. Be well.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4434rv1j8d.fsf>