Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:40:16 +0300 From: Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Subject: Re: iPXE booting latest PCengines alu board Message-ID: <F31BE3CE-0758-40F4-BFFC-9DE253352B24@cs.huji.ac.il> In-Reply-To: <53A08840.5060001@freebsd.org> References: <9D14C4BD-8A13-43FC-ACDA-0315A58CEBC6@cs.huji.ac.il> <5399C6A0.9010506@sentex.net> <A6728A0C-1420-47B4-8A0D-325A5C0644E0@cs.huji.ac.il> <539B47C0.2050400@sentex.net> <5FA602AC-C827-4727-A038-B96FBEF8E6AB@cs.huji.ac.il> <42ECF631-FC15-4036-8CD4-BC7B240AC265@cs.huji.ac.il> <53A08840.5060001@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 17, 2014, at 9:26 PM, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 6/17/14, 7:05 PM, Daniel Braniss wrote: >> if a gateway is needed, then all is ok. >> any ideas? > you are giving it the wrong netmask? >=20 no. BTW, the same setup is being used for PXE, and works (and has been = working since way back :-), it seems our pxe/pxeboot work fine with =91standard=92 PXE, but fails = with iPXE. I tracked it down to the rpc doing a sendutp and !PXE returning status =3D 1, fail, and I see = no traffic on the wire, there should have been an ARP request. just a shot in the dark, but it seems PXE handles correctly the routing = (send to gateway or local net) while iPXE does not. thanks, danny
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F31BE3CE-0758-40F4-BFFC-9DE253352B24>