Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Jun 2001 15:19:30 -0700
From:      Soren Kristensen <soren@soekris.com>
To:        Bsdguru@aol.com
Cc:        nate@yogotech.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Status of encryption hardware support in FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <3B3E5072.FEF9DF00@soekris.com>
References:  <81.c6bd74a.286f9cc5@aol.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

Bryan, again you're missing the point :-) You're working out from just
processing power, in the embedded world you usually start from somewhere
else....

In the case of my products, the requirement are small size, low cost, no
moving parts (no fans or disks), long life, low power, meaning a power
budget of 10W incl everything.... The 133 Mhz 486 processor use <2W and
the encryption processor is also <2W.

You cannot get any x86 processor that can meet the performance of the
encryption processor without needing a fan.... And when you add the cost
of all the other parts you need beside your mainboard and 1Ghz
processor, it's also more expensive than my solution.

But anyway, we can probably agree to disagree, so maybe we should let
this tread die....


Soren


> I think you've missed the fact that the '486 solution requires an add-on
> board (priced at $80.) and the faster cpu solution doesnt. That adds a lot of
> margin to get a faster MB, more than enough to compensate for the board.
> 
> Bryan
> 
>

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B3E5072.FEF9DF00>