Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:59:09 -0700 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: Beech Rintoul <beech@freebsd.org> Cc: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, "ruby@freebsd.org" <ruby@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Time to mark portupgrade deprecated? Message-ID: <D4EA1198-978F-41BF-BD54-556C8DD96F2D@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201107251115.00049.beech@freebsd.org> References: <CAF6rxg=TfxbKJwbcm6_c8P7m6%2B-pzvB9SpwKB99%2BLDe4OM%2BeLA@mail.gmail.com> <4E2CD52C.8060701@FreeBSD.org> <201107251115.00049.beech@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> Why pick portupgrade when a lot of people (including myself) use it? There are > probably 100's of ports more worthy of deprecation. Maybe there should be a > policy to deprecate all unmaintained ports if nobody steps up. You can always > drag it out of the attic if enough people squak and probably find someone to > maintain it in the process. > Personally, I don't see any reason at all to deprecate it. It works, it's maintained (by ruby@ and me personally) and it's generally useful. If someone feels that there's lack of maintainership here he's always welcome to step in and contribute time/resources. -- ST4096-RIPEhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D4EA1198-978F-41BF-BD54-556C8DD96F2D>