Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 16:22:18 -0800 From: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org> To: Hiten Pandya <hiten@unixdaemons.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should sendfile() to return ENOBUFS? Message-ID: <20030304002218.GY79234@perrin.int.nxad.com> In-Reply-To: <20030304001230.GC36475@unixdaemons.com> References: <20030303224418.GU79234@perrin.int.nxad.com> <20030304001230.GC36475@unixdaemons.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] > FWIW, there are many other parts of the sys/ tree where ENOBUFS or > any error code is not returned in the case of mbuf allocation, or > something on those lines, best candidate for this is the > sys/nfsserver code. Are you suggesting that the parts of the sys/ tree that don't return ENOBUFS should? FWIW, all I'm advocating right now is to get sendfile() fixed up and taken care of just because it's biting me in the arse and making life hell at the moment. -sc -- Sean Chittenden [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org> iD8DBQE+Y/G63ZnjH7yEs0ERAgNmAJ4iwW+aPyS1IYZIIK+MhUPPAUAzTwCeIySQ TkAHPuFVdsKJ22agerK/qBM= =0V0O -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030304002218.GY79234>