Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 01:39:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brandon D. Valentine" <bandix@looksharp.net> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Donn Miller <dmmiller@cvzoom.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vga0, atkbdc0, fdc0 attaching to ISA bus? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008070137180.68664-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008070132400.68579-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
>Well, I understand that, my question is, why are true PCI devices like
>video controllers still shown as being on isa0 by the kernel? I wanted
>an explanation of that. That's what doesn't make sense to me. Perhaps
>there's a valid PC/AT hardware limitation reason for it. Otherwise it
>seems silly. =)
If you can forget something, so can I. ;-)
I should have added:
vga0: <S3 Trio graphics accelerator> rev 0x00 int a irq 12 on pci0.16.0
vga0 at 0x3b0-0x3df maddr 0xa0000 msize 131072 on isa ^^^^^^^^^
^^^
That's what I'm talking about.
Brandon D. Valentine
--
bandix at looksharp.net | bandix at structbio.vanderbilt.edu
"Truth suffers from too much analysis." -- Ancient Fremen Saying
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0008070137180.68664-100000>