Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:01:33 -0800 From: Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r227310 - head/sys/fs/tmpfs Message-ID: <CAGMYy3uNx79tybkr7n8OFDEF44hiEm8p74vaJ8APJHL-sLkEuA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201111071621.pA7GLob4087040@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201111071621.pA7GLob4087040@svn.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org> wrote: > Author: marcel > Date: Mon Nov 7 16:21:50 2011 > New Revision: 227310 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/227310 > > Log: > Don astbestos garment and remove the warning about TMPFS being experimental > -- highly experimental even. So far the closest to a bug in TMPFS that people > have gotten to relates to how ZFS can take away from the memory that TMPFS > needs. One can argue that such is not a bug in TMPFS. Irrespective, even if > there is a bug here and there in TMPFS, it's not in our own advantage to > scare people away from using TMPFS. I for one have been using it, even with > ZFS, very successfully. Was the data corruption issue when mixing mmap/sendfile/read/writes fixed already? I haven't used tmpfs in such complicated environment in my use (which works well) but I remember some complains about it... Cheers, -- Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or diehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGMYy3uNx79tybkr7n8OFDEF44hiEm8p74vaJ8APJHL-sLkEuA>