Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 14:50:51 -0700 From: Matthew Hunt <mph@astro.caltech.edu> To: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> Cc: Jim Mock <jim@blues.ghis.net>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: epic4 Message-ID: <19991003145051.A56377@wopr.caltech.edu> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.991003090114.andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM>; from Will Andrews on Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 09:01:14AM -0400 References: <19991003141519.A734@blues.ghis.net> <XFMail.991003090114.andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 09:01:14AM -0400, Will Andrews wrote: > Is there really any reason to keep two different versions of EPIC anymore? > I always use EPIC4 rather than the ircii-epic port (which is > ircii2.8.2-EPIC3.004, which seems rather obsolete now). I am the maintainer of the old EPIC port. I also use EPIC4 now. I will remove the old port in a day or two, unless somebody volunteers a good reason not to. -- Matthew Hunt <mph@astro.caltech.edu> * Inertia is a property http://www.pobox.com/~mph/ * of matter. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991003145051.A56377>