Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:21:11 -0700 From: Hiroshi Nishida <nishida@asusa.net> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with FUSE + fts Message-ID: <57043A57.7030705@asusa.net> In-Reply-To: <56FD4788.5030808@asusa.net> References: <56F42EF4.5000505@asusa.net> <1294209833.31699182.1458950014610.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> <56F6148D.2030706@asusa.net> <56FAD050.2080707@asusa.net> <765991039.37160180.1459291777879.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> <56FB07DC.4000504@asusa.net> <2009006928.37186618.1459292816761.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> <56FB0DD0.4000806@asusa.net> <294037501.39717127.1459381643954.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> <56FD4788.5030808@asusa.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Since there is no response even at fuse-devel ML, I would like to write down a solution here.
* Symptom
When using a command that calls fts_read() like "find" or "rm -r" for a FUSE based filesystem, it outputs "No such file or directory" for some files/directories that exist.
* Solution
In /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-libs/work/libfuse-fuse_X_X_X/lib/fuse.c, the following struct is declared:
static struct fuse_lowlevel_ops fuse_path_ops = {
.init = fuse_lib_init,
.destroy = fuse_lib_destroy,
.lookup = fuse_lib_lookup,
.forget = fuse_lib_forget,
.forget_multi = fuse_lib_forget_multi,
.getattr = fuse_lib_getattr,
Here, comment out .forget and .forget_multi lines like:
static struct fuse_lowlevel_ops fuse_path_ops = {
.init = fuse_lib_init,
.destroy = fuse_lib_destroy,
.lookup = fuse_lib_lookup,
//.forget = fuse_lib_forget,
//.forget_multi = fuse_lib_forget_multi,
.getattr = fuse_lib_getattr,
Alternatively, you can use "noforget" mount option, though I'm not sure if it can be used for high level APIs like fuse_main().
--
Hiroshi Nishida
nishida@asusa.net
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57043A57.7030705>