Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:49:06 -0700
From:      Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To:        bsdml <pietro.bsdml@gmail.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "wolfgang@lyxys.ka.sub.org" <wolfgang@lyxys.ka.sub.org>
Subject:   Re: T40 bootloop on CAM status: Command timeout on both 10.1 and -CURRENT
Message-ID:  <CC9395C0-0B75-419E-B943-CCA7E5AAEEFA@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <55198A31.4090203@gmail.com>
References:  <551748A4.1090303@gmail.com> <20150329092713.GA69272@lyxys.ka.sub.org> <55198A31.4090203@gmail.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail


> On Mar 30, 2015, at 10:38, bsdml <pietro.bsdml@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hey wolfgang,
> 
> thanks for getting back to me. Adding hint.ata.1.disabled="1" in /boot/device.hints indeed did the trick and allowed me to boot both 10.1 and 11-CURRENT, however this workaround has temporary solved my problem but brings up to another headache. I have planned to get a bay caddy and swap the cdrom drive with a 7.200 rpm SATA hdd, but doing this way disabling the second SATA channel I will be unable to achieve such a thing.
> 
> Is there a chance that the bay caddy ATA will work without the need to disable the second ATA channel?

Has a bug been filed for this issue?

help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CC9395C0-0B75-419E-B943-CCA7E5AAEEFA>