Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 10:45:44 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin Makefile distinfo pkg-plist Message-ID: <20040119184544.GB6433@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <359167705.1074533881@andromede.reaumur.absolight.net> References: <200401191544.i0JFib85052132@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040119163258.GB4722@dragon.nuxi.com> <359167705.1074533881@andromede.reaumur.absolight.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 05:38:01PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> +-le 19/01/2004 08:32 -0800, David O'Brien ?crivait :
> | On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 07:44:37AM -0800, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> |> mat 2004/01/19 07:44:37 PST
> |>
> |> FreeBSD ports repository
> |>
> |> Modified files:
> |> mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
> |> Log:
> |> Update to 2.62
> |> Have the least thing possible between bsd.port.pre.mk and post.mk
> |
> | Please back this out. It is hard to read and find the dependencies. The
> | Porter's handbook clearly documents where w/in a port's Makefile
> | {BUILD,RUN}_DEPENDS belong in the Makefile.
>
> Do you really mean that every perl port that does this should be changed ?
> it's the first time someone tells me so.
Well, I guess that opens up a discussion then. I don't use many "p5"
ports, but I certainly do use SpamAssassin daily. So I hadn't noticed
that they go against the Porters Handbook and 'portlint'. It is
important to keep things all in the proper section so a user like me can
know what dependencies there are. Often I install dependencies from a
precompiled package before I add local patches to the "leaf" port that I
ultimately want installed.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040119184544.GB6433>