Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 21:40:41 +0300 From: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org> To: =?cp-1251?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, emulators@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: The future of Gentoo ports Message-ID: <20060609184041.GA1615@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> In-Reply-To: <448937F5.4070607@t-hosting.hu> References: <448937F5.4070607@t-hosting.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:57:25AM +0200, Kvesdn Gbor wrote: [...] > This introduces a new group of ports (linux_dist*) that are complete=20 > linux environment for cross-development, etc. At the same time a=20 > WITH_LINUXBASE macro should be added for installing them into=20 > ${LINUXBASE} and this requires a conditional CONFLICTS with another=20 > linux_base ports. I think it would be great if one can have more than one linux_base port installed at the same time. Something like /usr/compat/linux_debian /usr/compat/linux_suse /usr/compat/linux_fc /usr/compat/linux_gentoo /usr/compat/linux_rh and /usr/compat/linux being a symlink to the "default" one. Does anyone think that this would be useful? --=20 Vasil Dimov gro.DSBeerF@dv Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFEicCpFw6SP/bBpCARAkTaAKCqhxy+OEC3bTO1jGmLwYETS2u8eQCfX3jY V1fl85Au6YsexMFya7Si0Ik= =Xtdk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060609184041.GA1615>