Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Jesus Rodriguez <jesusr@ncsa.es>
Cc:        Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/etc services
Message-ID:  <199907010055.RAA42012@apollo.backplane.com>
References:   <XFMail.990701025133.jesusr@ncsa.es>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:On 01-Jul-99 Bill Fumerola wrote:
:> On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
:> 
:>> jkh         1999/06/30 17:08:09 PDT
:>> 
:>>   Modified files:
:>>     etc                  services 
:>>   Log:
:>>   Compromise proposal:  Comment out both old and new radius ports, explain
:>>   the differences in the comments, let the USER select which assignment to
:>>   use now.
:> 
:> The 'right' fix has been in for over a year, this violates POLA as well as
:> RFC.
:
:Yes, but the commit is the best solution for all. This has been discussed and
:the commit is a good solution for both sides (purists and the rest of the world)
:
:JesusR.

    I don't think changing the radius service port will actually fix anything.
    It will simply break people who haven't been broken before.

    At BEST we simply overrode the port as a command-line option to radiusd
    and forgot about it.  It wasn't worth trying to change /etc/services.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907010055.RAA42012>